And the problem with that is??

I was scanning the headlines of the W.S.J. this morning and an article caught my eye. The headline of the article was "Smith & Wesson Chairman Quits As Past Armed Robberies Surface". Seems as though this 74 year old man, who served on the board before becoming the CEO had done time in prision for armed robberies in the 50's and 60's.

Now I haven't taken my graduate level marketing course yet, but seems to me that a CEO should be familiar with ALL aspects of their product. Who better then a crook to run a gun company? I mean, he probably knows all about guns.

Now I understand that a convicted felon is not able to carry guns. But I would think as a CEO he could probably have "his people" carry them for him. If the business were in Texas he probably could get a permit to carry one as protection since he is a CEO.

Ohhhhh the irony of it all...maybe he should look into buying a mask company.